[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPsec and RTP crypto

To: sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM
Subject: Re: IPsec and RTP crypto
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:33:05 -0400
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <200104041647.f34GlZ912178@thunk.east.sun.com>
References: <200104041647.f34GlZ912178@thunk.east.sun.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

At 12:47 PM -0400 4/4/01, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>  > Jeff Schiller according to Basavaraj Patil's
>>  minutes (mobile IP WG chair) quotes Jeff as saying
>>  that IPsec is not really a good fit in situations
>>  where you want to protect some of the traffic, but
>>  not all of the traffic to another host.
>
>IPsec is a poor fit when you only want to protect some traffic of a
>particular flow (e.g., only packets which contain passwords, or only
>the packets with a mobile ip binding update).

Ah, that makes sense as something Jeff might have said!

Steve

References:

Re: IPsec and RTP crypto

From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: IPsec and RTP crypto
Next by Date: Re: IPsec and RTP crypto
Prev by thread: Re: IPsec and RTP crypto
Next by thread: Re: IPsec and RTP crypto
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread