[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard

To: "Scott G. Kelly" <skelly@redcreek.com>, "Dirk Rosler" <dirk@unicircuits.com>
Subject: RE: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard
From: "Christopher Gripp" <cgripp@axcelerant.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:47:50 -0700
Cc: "IPSec" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Thread-Index: AcEGWxliTJfJsQCQRM2YVm6siM3gpAAChrTA
Thread-Topic: FW: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard

Isn't Netscreen doing this in their latest code release also?

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott G. Kelly [mailto:skelly@redcreek.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Dirk Rosler
Cc: IPSec
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode
toProposed Standard


Dirk Rosler wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> does someone know which are the two existing client implementations?

RedCreek has a fielded implementation.

> 
> Also, what amendments to IPSec gateway are necessary (if any)?

The required modifications are documented in the draft.

Scott

Prev by Date: Re: FW: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC TunnelMode toProposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard
Prev by thread: Re: FW: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC TunnelMode toProposed Standard
Next by thread: RE: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread