[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode toProposed Standard
Thank you. I'd be very interested in obtaining evaluation versions from
those two companies and other vendors. Please contact me privately on this
address or under dirk.rosler@bt.com
Our main requirements or multi-platform (mainly Win & Mac) and certificate
(Baltimore & VeriSign) support.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Dirk
>
> Yes, we do support DHCP relay through ipsec tunnel in 2.60 release.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Michael Shieh
> NetScreen Technologies, Inc
> 350 Oakmead Parkway
> Sunnyvale, CA 94085
> TEL: (408)730-6060
> FAX: (408)730-6050
> Email: mshieh@netscreen.com
> --------------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Gripp [mailto:cgripp@axcelerant.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 2:48 PM
> To: Scott G. Kelly; Dirk Rosler
> Cc: IPSec
> Subject: RE: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode
> toProposed Standard
>
>
> Isn't Netscreen doing this in their latest code release also?
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott G. Kelly [mailto:skelly@redcreek.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:46 AM
> To: Dirk Rosler
> Cc: IPSec
> Subject: Re: Protocol Action: DHCPv4 Configuration of IPSEC Tunnel Mode
> toProposed Standard
>
>
> Dirk Rosler wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> does someone know which are the two existing client implementations?
>
> RedCreek has a fielded implementation.
>
>>
>> Also, what amendments to IPSec gateway are necessary (if any)?
>
> The required modifications are documented in the draft.
>
> Scott
>
References: