Re: per-host keying

[Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>]

At 8:37 PM -0400 7/14/01, Michael Richardson wrote:
>   Thanks for the responses. I figured that I was blind.
>
>   Should 2401 be revised at some point, I suggest the words "per-host keying"
>be added to 4.4.1 section (a).

In revising 2401 I plan to reword the selector discussion 
extensively, to clarify this detail that, as you noted, is easily 
missed.  However, I would not call it "per host keying" because it 
can be used to achieve finer granularity keying.  Still, we can put 
in the phrase (to make it easy to search for) as part of the 
discussion.

Steve

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: per-host keying
• From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

References:

• Re: per-host keying
• From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

---

• Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
• Next by Date: Man in the middle attack (draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt)?
• Prev by thread: Re: per-host keying
• Next by thread: Re: per-host keying
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread