[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSec performance statistics

To: sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM
Subject: Re: IPSec performance statistics
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 19:30:28 -0400
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:09:42 EDT." <200108022009.f72K9hJ06140@thunk.east.sun.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com


>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM> writes:
    Bill> Main mode + quick mode + first-user-traffic winds up being about 5
    Bill> round trips, so network latency winds up being a dominant factor in
    Bill> how long it takes to get things flowing..

  so long as there is enough CPU leftover, of course.

  I'd be interested to know how long it takes before 1000 road warriors are
able to function again after rebooting the gateway :-)

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

References:

Re: IPSec performance statistics

From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: IPSec performance statistics
Next by Date: Position statement on IKE development
Prev by thread: Re: IPSec performance statistics
Next by thread: RE: IPSec performance statistics
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread