[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (KAME-snap 5215) ESP Encryption Key

To: akshay.singh@analog.com
Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 5215) ESP Encryption Key
From: Shoichi Sakane <sakane@kame.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 15:52:48 +0900
Cc: snap-users@kame.net, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:55:32 -0700"<001901c11d38$92593b20$c78b4789@pctest1>
References: <001901c11d38$92593b20$c78b4789@pctest1>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> I have a question related to esp encryption key ,
> I am using 3des so I set my keys as 
> case 1:
>  { 0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,
>    0x02,0x02,0x02,0x02,0x02,0x02,0x02,0x02,
>    0x03,0x03,0x03,0x03,0x03,0x03,0x03,0x03}
> Here problem is this If I use the keys as 
> case 2:
>  { 0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,
>    0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,
>    0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x01}
> the encrypted results are same in case 1 and case 2. Can any one tell why it is 
> same even I am using different keys ?

i'm not sure what the platform you are using.
at least, these key cannot be installed into the kernel based kame stack.
kame stack says "esp_cbc_mature 3des-cbc: weak key was passed",

Follow-Ups:

Re: (KAME-snap 5215) ESP Encryption Key

From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>

References:

ESP Encryption Key

From: "akshay" <akshay.singh@analog.com>

Prev by Date: Packet Interceptor Implementation for IPSec
Next by Date: Re: Position statement on IKE development
Prev by thread: ESP Encryption Key
Next by thread: Re: (KAME-snap 5215) ESP Encryption Key
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread