[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt

To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
From: borderlt <border@hns.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 18:50:23 -0400
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com


    Re getting rid of aggressive mode...  Sigh!  I can see the reasoning
behind wanting to simplify down to only one mode.  But, not offering the
option for fewer messages will affect deployment of IPsec for links with high
latency.  We are starting to see a lot demand for the use of IPsec over
satellite links with the usual corresponding optimization questions.  And,
identity hiding is not important for the cases where this has come up...


John

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt

From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: IKE must have no Heirs
Next by Date: Re: Phase 1 IDs ("son of IKE")
Prev by thread: RE: IKE must have no Heirs
Next by thread: Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread