Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt

[Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>]

 >>>>> "Henry" == Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:
     Henry> If dim memory serves, there were many cries about how TCP would not meet
     Henry> everyone's needs, and how there were conflicting requirements, and etc. 
     Henry> etc. etc... but in fact TCP really does meet *most* people's needs, even
     Henry> if it is not precisely optimal in many cases. 

   At this point, if we switch from UDP, it should be to SCTP.
   During the original debate SCTP did not exist.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

---

References:

• Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
• From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying IKE
• Next by Date: Preserve client IP Address with IPSec
• Prev by thread: Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
• Next by thread: problems in manual keying
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread