[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simplifying IKE

To: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Simplifying IKE
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:39:06 +0300
Cc: sankar ramamoorthi <sankar@nexsi.com>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@F-Secure.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108081358030.4332-100000@janpc-home.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-ipsec i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0

Jan Vilhuber wrote:

> 
> making a 2 message exchange. I favor an even number of messages. Whether
> that's 2 or 4 I don't MUCH care (2 would be preferable if we can figure out
> how). 

I'd just like to repeat my preference for the minimal number of messages
even in this context. When these things are used over cellular links with
relatively long delays, additional messages really affect the delays before
you can start work.

Jari

Follow-Ups:

Re: Simplifying IKE

From: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>

References:

RE: Simplifying IKE

From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Simplifying IKE
Next by Date: Re: Simplifying IKE
Prev by thread: RE: Simplifying IKE
Next by thread: Re: Simplifying IKE
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread