[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (More) immediate changes to help interop problems?
I suspect most people are busy with the IETF and (soon) the bakeoff. Most of
the discussion on the list seems to be coming from non-IETF participants. I
know that I haven't been able to follow the conversation in real-time and I
suspect most other people haven't either.
Hopefully, the discussion will start up on the list next week when we get
back, and we can always discuss this stuff amongst ourselves at the bakeoff.
Andrew
-------------------------------------------
Upon closer inspection, I saw that the line
dividing black from white was in fact a shade
of grey. As I drew nearer still, the grey area
grew larger. And then I was enlightened.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoffrey Huang [mailto:ghuang@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:46 AM
> To: andrew.krywaniuk@alcatel.com; ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: RE: (More) immediate changes to help interop problems?
>
>
> > > So I've seen many messages concerning long-term development
> > > for the next
> > > IKE, but what happened to discussion on fixing some
> shortcomings that
> > > immediately affect interoperability? Andrew K. mentioned a
> > > few yesterday
> > > during his presentation, but off the top of my head, I can
> > > think of a few
> > > ambiguities:
> > >
> > > - Rekeying/Ph. 1 Responder Lifetime
> > > - Unreliable Delete/Notifies
> > > - Optional Cert Request Payload
> > > - Some way to detect dead peers/stale SAs
> > >
> > > I'm just thinking of issues in currently deployed scenarios...
> >
> > Didn't I mention all of the above in my presentation? (I
> know it wasn't in
> > great depth, but we didn't make great use of our alloted time.)
>
> You certainly did, as I mention above -- I'm just wondering why the
> discussion about this hasn't continued...
>
> -g
>
> > Andrew
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Upon closer inspection, I saw that the line
> > dividing black from white was in fact a shade
> > of grey. As I drew nearer still, the grey area
> > grew larger. And then I was enlightened.
> >
> >
>
>
References: