[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Traffic handling and key management "divide and coquer"

To: "Sara Bitan" <sarab@cs.Technion.AC.IL>
Subject: Re: Traffic handling and key management "divide and coquer"
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:36:29 -0400
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <003901c1249d$86b1a8e0$0300000a@bilbo>
References: <003901c1249d$86b1a8e0$0300000a@bilbo>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Title: Re: Traffic handling and key management "divide and co

Sara,

i think your suggestion is a reasonable one. We should realize that before we separate the AH/ESP work from key management, we need to establish a clearer set of requirements of what these protocols require in the way of SA management, separate from key management. we have yet to do that.

Steve

References:

Traffic handling and key management "divide and coquer"

From: "Sara Bitan" <sarab@cs.Technion.AC.IL>

Prev by Date: RE: Simplifying IKE
Next by Date: RE: IKE must have no Heirs
Prev by thread: Re: Traffic handling and key management "divide and coquer"
Next by thread: RE: Traffic handling and key management "divide and coquer"
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread