[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XKMS and NIH RE: Simplifying IKE
At 6:54 AM -0700 8/17/01, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> The only difference between
>the W3C process and IETF process is that in W3C process Jeff and Marcus
>have effective veto power on security grounds for any protocol. In W3C
>Tim Berners-Lee has veto power but he is not a security specialist.
This is completely wrong on many counts.
- Jeff and Marcus only have "veto power" for WG items moving to IETF last call.
- During IESG review, every IESG member has partial veto power (you
need more than one to "veto" a draft).
- IETF WG chairs have pretty significant "veto power", more than area
directors do early in the process.
- In the W3C, there are many people (in particular, WG chairs) who
have effective veto power throughout the process.
Playing "my standards body is better than your standards body" is a
boring game, particularly when the people you are playing it with
don't know the facts.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
References: