[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question on SPI

To: "Pars MUTAF" <pars.mutaf@inrialpes.fr>
Subject: Re: question on SPI
From: "mahdavi" <mahdavi@sepahan.iut.ac.ir>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:49:37 +0430
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
References: <3A6D367EA1EFD4118C9B00A0C9DD99D706502C@rerun.lucentctc.com> <p05010416b7a85aa859a0@[128.33.84.34]> <3B8547DB.AB6D0FC1@inrialpes.fr>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

you can generate it every way you want . but random is better. just behalf
ipsec must agree with it and also it must not be used for another SA.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pars MUTAF" <pars.mutaf@inrialpes.fr>
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:43 PM
Subject: question on SPI


>
> Hi all;
>
> How a host picks the SPIs when establishing SAs?
> (i.e., randomly? consecutively?)
>
> Any limitation, suggestion (or documentation)
> on that?
>
> Help please! Thank you...
>
> Regards,
> pars
>

References:

SPD per interface?

From: "Cambria, Mike" <mcambria@avaya.com>

Re: SPD per interface?

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

question on SPI

From: Pars MUTAF <pars.mutaf@inrialpes.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Incoming SPD check on packet with no IPsec header?
Next by Date: Re: Ipsec load balancing devices - UDP-ESP impact
Prev by thread: RE: question on SPI
Next by thread: Re: SPD per interface?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread