[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries

To: "'Wei-Jen Yeh'" <weijyeh@nortelnetworks.com>, William Dixon <wdixon@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries
From: "Mason, David" <David_Mason@nai.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 08:32:50 -0500
Cc: "Steve.Robinson" <Steve.Robinson@psti.com>, Puja Puri <puja.puri@cdac.ernet.in>, ipsec <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>, ranjeet barve <ranjeet_barve@yahoo.co.in>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

One of the reasons for having ordered SPDs is interoperability.  If you have
overlapping SPDs and they are in different orders on both sides of the VPN
link, then you may run into connectivity problems.  To correct a problem of
this sort, one of the sides will need to change the order of their SPDs.

-dave

Prev by Date: Re: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries
Next by Date: RE: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries
Prev by thread: RE: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries
Next by thread: RE: DataStructure for Storing SPD,SA Entries
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread