[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft

To: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
Date: 21 Nov 2001 12:13:24 -0500
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: Henry Spencer's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:07:21 -0500 (EST)"
References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1011121120621.12699M-100000@spsystems.net>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

> Uh, no, you miss the point -- this discussion is about a new standard,
> remember.  A new standard can pick one and say "do it *THAT* way, and
> no other".

Ahh, I did misunderstand.  I thought you meant "pick one" for an
implementor, not for the spec.  Yes, the spec should pick one (or two)
and say "implement these".  I would say X.509 and PGP :)

>                                                           Henry Spencer
>                                                        henry@spsystems.net

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

References:

Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

Prev by Date: Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft
Next by Date: Re: SOI: identity protection and DOS
Prev by thread: Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft
Next by thread: Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread