[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA

To: Paul Koning <ni1d@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA
From: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Cc: hugo@ee.technion.ac.il, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <15363.41738.290718.340912@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
References: <200111261211.fAQCBRL00559@fatty.lounge.org><Pine.GSO.4.21.0111270023240.11590-100000@ee.technion.ac.il><15363.41738.290718.340912@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Paul Koning writes:
 > >>>>> "Hugo" == Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il> writes:
 >  Hugo> ...
 >  Hugo> As I said in my note, I believe (and hope that you agree) that
 >  Hugo> A TRULY SOUND KEY EXCHANGE PROTOCOL SHOULD NOT RELY ON EXTERNAL
 >  Hugo> MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE ITS MOST ESSENTIAL SECURITY PROPERTIES
 > 
 >  Hugo> In particular, the protocol MUST DEFINE ITS OWN AUTHENTICATION
 >  Hugo> MECHANISMS.
 > 
 > I completely agree.

   I have a hard time reconciling this with the modularity
   principle. Begging, borrowing and stealing is Good Thing, IMO.

		   Mike

References:

Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA

From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>

Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA

From: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>

Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA

From: Paul Koning <ni1d@arrl.net>

Prev by Date: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp-02.txt
Next by Date: On shared keys (was RE: SOI: identity protection and DOS)
Prev by thread: Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA
Next by thread: Re: IKEv2 and SIGMA
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread