[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LAST CALL: NAT TRAVERSAL DRAFTS
- To: Jayant Shukla <jshukla@trlokom.com>
- Subject: Re: LAST CALL: NAT TRAVERSAL DRAFTS
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:11:50 -0500
- Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
- In-Reply-To: <000001c179bb$4c70f140$9865fea9@TRLSHUKLA1>; from jshukla@trlokom.com on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:13:04PM -0800
- References: <000001c179bb$4c70f140$9865fea9@TRLSHUKLA1>
- Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:13:04PM -0800, Jayant Shukla wrote:
> These drafts infringe on our pending patents, specifically the part about transport mode
> ESP encapsulation.
>
> BTW, the original ESP-UDP proposal does not infringe on our IP. The modifications
> that were made after the San Diego meeting (where we presented
> our proposal) are the problem.
Can you say a bit more about specifically which portions of the
proposal infringe your pending patents?
And did you disclose to the working group that you had patents pending
on your proposal when you made your presentation?
Many thanks,
- Ted