[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Son-of-IKE Performance

To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: Son-of-IKE Performance
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:26:38 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <200112072110.fB7L9uG01024@fatty.lounge.org>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Dan Harkins wrote:
>   My point is that just saying "by obvious means" is not good enough.
> After seeing how emminently reasonable people interpreted "by obvious
> means" differently during implementation of RFC2409 I think it is
> necessary to explain the means exactly.

I concur.  One thing that all too many IETF protocols suffer from is the
inability to produce a fully interoperable implementation solely from the
documents, without relying on a body of folklore to fill in details.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net

References:

Re: Son-of-IKE Performance

From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Please save the pre-shared key mode
Next by Date: RE: Please save the pre-shared key mode
Prev by thread: Re: Son-of-IKE Performance
Next by thread: RE: Son-of-IKE Performance
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread