[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Subject: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:39:32 -0800
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Dec 2001 20:04:41 +0200." <15378.22073.715364.46210@ryijy.hel.fi.ssh.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 20:04:41 +0200 you wrote
>
> I think it would be better to change the format of subnet selectors to
> be IPVx_ADDRESS + Number of bits in the mask. It would remove the
> problems what to do when the other end proposes mask 0xff00ff00?
> (According to above it is completely valid :-)

A mask of 0xff00ff00 _is_ completely valid.

  Dan.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

References:

Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>

Prev by Date: Michael's comments on ikev2 draft
Next by Date: Re: Interoperability issues in setting up SAs
Prev by thread: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread