[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>
Subject: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:54:15 -0700
cc: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:39:32 PST." <20011210213932.B366354C42@tailor.sailpix.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com> writes:
    Dan> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 20:04:41 +0200 you wrote
    >> 
    >> I think it would be better to change the format of subnet selectors to
    >> be IPVx_ADDRESS + Number of bits in the mask. It would remove the
    >> problems what to do when the other end proposes mask 0xff00ff00?
    >> (According to above it is completely valid :-)

    Dan> A mask of 0xff00ff00 _is_ completely valid.

  CIDR routing people would strongly disagree.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

From: Charles Lynn <clynn@bbn.com>

References:

Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt

From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>

Prev by Date: IKEv2 and NAT traversal
Next by Date: Re: compare-jfk-sigma.txt
Prev by thread: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Re: Some comments to draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-00.txt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread