[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability

To: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:46:17 -0500
cc: Scott Fanning <sfanning@cisco.com>, IETF-IPSec <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:15:50 EST." <Pine.BSI.3.91.1011217195516.7263c-100000@spsystems.net>
Reply-to: sommerfeld@east.sun.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> (b) An IKE1-only responder must reliably reject attempts to use IKE2
> to it.

Retroactive specification is such fun.

Do you mean:
	a *correctly-implemented* IKE1-only responder
or
	"all commonly-used IKE1 implementations"

?


				- Bill

Follow-Ups:

Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

References:

Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Should Alice say who she wants to talk to?
Next by Date: Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability
Prev by thread: Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability
Next by thread: Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread