[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IKE v2 Requirements and backwards compatability
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Shane Amante wrote:
> Aside from whatever method is ultimately decided upon for automagic
> detection of a remote peer's IKE version number, would it be too much
> to ask for a knob in IKEv2 implementations that allow operators/users
> to manually configure the remote peer as being IKEv1 or IKEv2?
Perhaps. This amounts to requiring that every IKE2 implementation also
implement IKE1. Initially, that is probably a reasonable thing to do...
but it may not remain so. IKE1 shouldn't be a mandatory part of IKE2.
Henry Spencer
henry@spsystems.net
Follow-Ups:
References: