[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?

To: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>, "Andrew Wenlang Zhu" <Andrew_zhu@hp.com>, <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
From: Kai Martius <kai@secunet.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 09:48:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <00cd01c1ab5c$9f0b1890$9080ad40@cisco.com>
References: <001001c1ab59$11becac0$6f690d0f@AZ735043>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Hello,

(I was just about to ask a similar / related question...)

At 11:59 01.02.2002 -0800, Scott Fanning wrote:
>and on that note.. If AES is the MUST implement algorithm, does that include
>all key sizes?

... and how are different key sizes reflected by the identifiers? Will we
have different identifiers in IKE and IPsec for 128, 192 and 256 bits? For
the currently IANA-defined identifiers ESP_AES and OAKLEY_AES_CBC, it is
assumed to be 128bit, I think (?).

Kai

-- 
Kai Martius
secunet Security Networks AG
Dresden - Germany

Follow-Ups:
- Rijndael
  - From: Kerem Önal <kerem.onal@bilten.metu.edu.tr>
- Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
  - From: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>

References:
- What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
  - From: "Andrew Wenlang Zhu" <Andrew_zhu@hp.com>
- Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
  - From: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
Next by Date: Rijndael
Prev by thread: Re: What is the standardization status of AES in IPSec?
Next by thread: Rijndael
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread