[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: why the SAs are unidirectional

To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:36:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E16cx02-000124-00@xmission.xmission.com>
References: <E16cx02-000124-00@xmission.xmission.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

For mutlicast, unidirectional SAs are very appropriate, especially 
given our sequence number and SPI conventions.

Steve

References:
- RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
  - From: "Hilarie Orman, Purple Streak Development" <hilarie@xmission.com>

Prev by Date: RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
Next by Date: RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
Prev by thread: RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
Next by thread: RE: why the SAs are unidirectional
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread