[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Phase 1 Lifetime and Lifedata



I normally do not use it either, but some implementations have both enabled
by default. Others do not support it in phase one.  I guess the question
should be, should it be supported and if so why.
Ed 

-----Original Message-----
From: dfox@quarrytech.com [mailto:dfox@quarrytech.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:32 PM
To: ewilkinson@efficient.com
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: Phase 1 Lifetime and Lifedata


In the last couple of implementations, that I was involved with testing, we
didn't use Lifedata in Phase 1.  The reason for this is that the ISAKMP
communications are so small that it didn't make sense.  If it was sent to
us, we dealt with it appropriately.  We always used Lifetime, however.

David

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David Fox                                                
Quarry Technologies                                dfox@quarrytech.com
8 New England Executive Park                 Direct: 781-359-5094
Burlington, Massachusetts  01803            Main: 781-505-8300 x5094
www.quarrytech.com                                FAX:   781-505-8316
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Edward Wilkinson [mailto:ewilkinson@efficient.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:31 PM
To:	Ipsec (E-mail)
Subject:	Phase 1 Lifetime and Lifedata

When using some of the gateways and clients, I see  an option to set
lifedata..  Is this filed valid in phase 1 and if it is how would it be
used.