[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAT Traversal

To: "'Jayant Shukla'" <jshukla@trlokom.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: NAT Traversal
From: Takaoka Takayoshi <ttakaoka@nvc.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:43:27 +0900
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

That means, a certain router drop the IKE keep-alive packet, right?
I need more information for this issue.

Best regards,
Taka

-----Original Message-----
From: Jayant Shukla [mailto:jshukla@trlokom.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:18 PM
To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: NAT Traversal

The proposed NAT traversal method runs into problems with some routers that
monitor the IKE cookies. What steps are being taken to overcome this
problem?

Regards,
Jayant

Follow-Ups:
- RE: NAT Traversal
  - From: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: questions on Anti Replay Check
Next by Date: Re: questions on Anti Replay Check
Prev by thread: Re: questions on Anti Replay Check
Next by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread