[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAT Traversal



> 
> Note that RSIP != NAT (per se).  Since RSIP requires interaction
> between the sending client and the translator gateway, I don't see a
> problem with the NAT traversal drafts.  If the client is RSIPsec
> aware, then it does not need IPsec NAT traversal (because it knows
> what the external address will be).  So, what's the problem?  If it's
> using RSIP, it doesn't use NAT Traversal.  It's sort of like if you're
> using TCP on a socket, you can't use UDP on that socket.
> 
> So, again, I don't see the problem.  There are two protocols that
> effectively do the same thing; you just cannot use them both at the
> same time.  However, the client KNOWS when it's using one of them so
> it can make the choice about which one to use.
> 
> -derek

So you have concluded that there is NO problem? This is great, just a
while ago you had no clue how the pass-thru worked and now you have
concluded that there is no problem. Amazing!

Regards,
Jayant