[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NAT Traversal
>
> Note that RSIP != NAT (per se). Since RSIP requires interaction
> between the sending client and the translator gateway, I don't see a
> problem with the NAT traversal drafts. If the client is RSIPsec
> aware, then it does not need IPsec NAT traversal (because it knows
> what the external address will be). So, what's the problem? If it's
> using RSIP, it doesn't use NAT Traversal. It's sort of like if you're
> using TCP on a socket, you can't use UDP on that socket.
>
> So, again, I don't see the problem. There are two protocols that
> effectively do the same thing; you just cannot use them both at the
> same time. However, the client KNOWS when it's using one of them so
> it can make the choice about which one to use.
>
> -derek
So you have concluded that there is NO problem? This is great, just a
while ago you had no clue how the pass-thru worked and now you have
concluded that there is no problem. Amazing!
Regards,
Jayant