[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAT Traversal

To: pcn@cisco.com
Subject: Re: NAT Traversal
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:50:13 -0500
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <sjmofiaswcw.fsf@hodge-podge.mit.edu><Pine.GSO.4.33.0202270924160.28341-100000@irp-view5.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>>>>> "Chinna" == Chinna N R Pellacuru <pcn@cisco.com> writes:

 Chinna> On 27 Feb 2002, Derek Atkins wrote:
 >> ...
 >> Assumption: My home LAN is insecure!  It's sitting on a wireless
 >> network, I don't know who may be listening in on it.

 Chinna> you could also choose to run a layer 2 security protocol to
 Chinna> secure your home wireless network.

Which one?  Not WEP, since it's not a security protocol.

      paul

References:
- Re: NAT Traversal
  - From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
- Re: NAT Traversal
  - From: "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NAT Traversal
Next by Date: Re: NAT Traversal
Prev by thread: Re: NAT Traversal
Next by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread