RE: NAT Traversal

["Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>]

Apparently Christian didn't name it the way he said it would be done.
The doc is actually:
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ngtrans-shipworm-05.tx
t

Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asimu@cisco.com [mailto:asimu@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 5:47 PM
> To: Tony Hain
> Subject: Re: NAT Traversal
>
>
> Hi Tony
>
> I couldn't find the draft on the IETF site. Could you please send a
> pointer?
>
> Thanks
> -Adina
>
> Tony Hain wrote:
> >
> > Markus Stenberg wrote:
> > > If 'change all network devices' was applicable solution, I'd
> > > say we'd be
> > > running IPv6 and not worrying about the legacy issues (such
> > > as NAT) at all.
> >
> > Fortunately IPv6 does not require 'change all network
> devices' as its
> > deployment model. It will work fine by treating the existing IPv4
> > Internet as a layer-2 multi-access media (which happens to
> have a well
> > recognized 20 byte frame header) like IPv4 does with Frame
> Relay. Refer
> > to draft-ietf-ngtrans-teredo-05.txt as a way to push the
> NAT traversal
> > problem out of your space, so you can focus on simply
> making end-to-end
> > IPsec work well. There is no reason to waste the time of
> this WG on an
> > experiment that escaped from the lab and went very wrong...
> >
> > Tony