[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAT Traversal

To: Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com>
Subject: RE: NAT Traversal
From: "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:31:06 -0800 (PST)
cc: Jayant Shukla <jshukla@trlokom.com>, "'Henrik Levkowetz'" <henrik@ipunplugged.com>, "'ipsec mailling list'" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203041109080.32182-100000@intotoinc.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Srinivasa Addepalli wrote:
>   Also think of Manual Key Managed IPSEC policies. SPIs are manually
>   configured.
>

And, why can't manually configured SPIs follow the new semantics?

    chinna

Follow-Ups:
- RE: NAT Traversal
  - From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
- RE: NAT Traversal
  - From: Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com>

References:
- RE: NAT Traversal
  - From: Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-01.txt
Next by Date: RE: NAT Traversal
Prev by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Next by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread