[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAT Traversal

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: NAT Traversal
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 17:23:06 -0500
cc: "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>, Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com>, Jayant Shukla <jshukla@trlokom.com>, "'Henrik Levkowetz'" <henrik@ipunplugged.com>, "'ipsec mailling list'" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2002 17:05:41 EST." <p0510030ab8a99f63a5ba@[128.89.88.34]>
Reply-to: sommerfeld@east.sun.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> 	- do I understand correctly that you are suggesting a change 
> to the specs to reduce the effective SPI space by a factor of 65K? 
> is everyone comfortable with this?

I, for one, am not.

					- Bill

References:
- RE: NAT Traversal
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: RE: NAT Traversal
Next by Date: RE: NAT Traversal
Prev by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Next by thread: RE: NAT Traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread