RE: NAT Traversal

[Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>]

>>>>> "Chinna" == Chinna N R Pellacuru <pcn@cisco.com> writes:

 Chinna> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Paul Koning wrote:

 >> > I just want to make sure that there is no technical content in this
 >> > discussion anymore.
 >> >
 >> > We are down to the phase where are trying to figure out what the meaning
 >> > of "is" is.
 >>
 >> I find your attempt to compare me with William J. Clinton utterly
 >> offensive and entirely unacceptable for a technical discussion.

 Chinna> I found your comment about our implementation being "all
 Chinna> hole" utterly offensive and entirely unacceptable for a
 Chinna> technical discussion.

Ah.  I did not think those words would be read as an attack on your
personal honesty and integrity.  Instead, I intended it as a criticism
(perhaps a harsh one) on the technical soundness of your proposal (not
your implementation, which I do not know -- nor on you personally).
If it came across as a personal attack, my apologies.

On the other hand, I find it difficult to interpret your comment as
anything other than an attack on my honesty and personal integrity.  I
do not believe I have given anyone any cause for calling me dishonest
and of unsound moral character.  Yet your words appear to do just
that.  Why?

	paul