[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remove little-used algorithms from IKEv2
>>>>> <Paul Hoffman> writes:
>> The early goals of the successor-to-IKE work was to make it
>> simpler and more interoperable. Continuing to list values for
>> algorithms that are rarely used or do not have good
>> interoperabilty, or both, goes against both of those goals. ...
>> The following lists show the algorithms should be removed from the
>> IKEv2 spec. Those marked with an asterisk should be removed from
>> IKEv2.
I agree with your list. In fact, I'd add a * to one more: ENCR_CAST.
paul