[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remove little-used algorithms from IKEv2



>>>>>   <Paul Hoffman> writes:

 >> The early goals of the successor-to-IKE work was to make it
 >> simpler and more interoperable. Continuing to list values for
 >> algorithms that are rarely used or do not have good
 >> interoperabilty, or both, goes against both of those goals. ...

 >> The following lists show the algorithms should be removed from the
 >> IKEv2 spec. Those marked with an asterisk should be removed from
 >> IKEv2.

I agree with your list.  In fact, I'd add a * to one more: ENCR_CAST.

    paul