[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
To
: Michael Choung Shieh <
mshieh@netscreen.com
>
Subject
: Re: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <
sommerfeld@east.sun.com
>
Date
: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:28:51 -0500
cc
: "'
sommerfeld@east.sun.com
'" <
sommerfeld@east.sun.com
>, IP Security List <
ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
>
In-Reply-To
: Your message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:18:50 PST." <
9D048F4A422CD411A56500B0D0209C5B028F3DB5@NS-CA
>
Reply-to
:
sommerfeld@east.sun.com
Sender
:
owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Besides, how do you decide if tunnel can be created two words: "transport mode"
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
From:
Mike Ditto <ford@incog.com>
References
:
RE: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
From:
Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>
Prev by Date:
RE: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
Next by Date:
Move TS to optional (RE: Don't remove TS from IKEv2)
Prev by thread:
RE: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
Next by thread:
Re: Don't remove TS from IKEv2
Index(es):
Date
Thread