[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2

To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:10:35 -0800
In-Reply-To: <p05101511b8c82984e1cb@[165.227.249.20]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

At 06:00 PM 3/27/2002 -0800, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
>
>Suite A
>Phase 1: AES-128, SHA-1, preshared keys, MODP group 5
>Phase 2: AES-128, SHA-1, MODP group 5, ESP tunnel mode
>
>Suite B
>Phase 1: AES-128, SHA-1, RSA certs, MODP group 5
>Phase 2: AES-128, SHA-1, MODP group 5, ESP tunnel mode
>

Wouldn't SHA-2 be more suitable?

- Alex
--

Alex Alten
Alten@ATTBI.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

References:
- User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

Prev by Date: RE: Do we actually need dynamic ports?
Next by Date: Re: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
Prev by thread: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
Next by thread: Re: User interface ciphersuites for IKEv2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread