[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Status of SCTP
Hello!
I'm sorry about the stupid questions. I should have remembered
"RTFM first" ;-)
draft-ietf-ipsec-jfk-03 specifies in section 5:
JFK supports two different address types: a list of IPv4 address
ranges, and a list of IPv6 address ranges. A single address is a
range where the starting and ending elements are the same.
Subnets are converted to range format. The notion of "all
addresses" is expressed as the pair (0, 0xFFFFFFFF) for IPv4; v6
is handled similarly.
and draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-01 specifies in section 2.9:
IKEv2 is more flexible than IKEv1. IKEv2 allows sets of ranges of
both addresses and ports, and allows the Responder to choose a subset
of the requested traffic rather than simply responding "not
acceptable".
It seems that both JFK and IKEv2 support SCTP's set of addresses
(multihoming) feature.
What about the draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp draft? Is it already submitted
to the IESG? I didn't find any information about
the draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp on the home page of the IESG.
Best Regards,
Juha Ollila
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ollila Juha (NET/Oulu)
> Sent: 24 April, 2002 13:45
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Status of SCTP
>
>
> Hello!
>
> What is the status of draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp? Will it be
> submitted as Draft Standard in October?
>
> Is it planned to add support for SCTP in IKEv2 or JFK?
>
> Best Regards,
> Juha Ollila
>