RE: question on "code preserving" section in Paul's draft

["Dennis Beard"<beardd@nortelnetworks.com>]

RE: question on "code preserving" section in Paul's = draft

Hi Mike,

Paul can comment in more detail, however "code = preserving" does not mean a full implementation of IKEv1.  = Radia Perlman can also expand on this topic.

Hope this note finds you well.

Cheers,

Dennis Beard

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [<3d.htm>mailto:mat@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:34 PM
To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: question on "code preserving" = section in Paul's draft


Paul's SOI draft seems to imply that an IKEv2
implementation must also implement IKEv1 as = well.

Is that the intention of the IKEv2 authors? If
so, there's more to this issue, not the least = of
which is an even *heavier* burden placed on = small
memory footprint widgets.

        =          = Mike