Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.5 Plausible denaibility

[Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>]

>>>>> "Theodore" == Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> writes:

 Theodore> Please discuss and answer this question.....  (for more
 Theodore> discussion and a clear definition of "plausible
 Theodore> denaibility", please see section 2.5 of the soi-features
 Theodore> I-D).

 Theodore> 2.5) Plausible denaibility

 Theodore> 2.5.A) Does SOI need to provide "plausible deniability"
 Theodore> (the opposite of "non-repudiation") for the initiator?

 Theodore> 2.5.B) Does SOI need to provide "plausible deniability"
 Theodore> (the opposite of "non-repudiation") for the responder?

No.

(As for discussion, I'm not sure what there is to discuss.  Perhaps
"what conceivable purpose would it serve?")

	paul