[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
To
:
ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject
: Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
From
: "Housley, Russ" <
rhousley@rsasecurity.com
>
Date
: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:00:22 -0400
In-Reply-To
: <
200206190546.g5J5kLr23037@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
>
References
: <Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:17:14 EDT." <
E17KRHm-0001IX-00@think.thunk.org
>
Sender
:
owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
PFS is not needed by everyone. For that reason, I think it should be optional. Russ
Follow-Ups
:
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
From:
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
References
:
SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
From:
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
From:
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Prev by Date:
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.4 Number of crypto operations
Next by Date:
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.3 Authentication styles
Prev by thread:
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
Next by thread:
Re: SOI QUESTIONS: 2.2 Perfect forward secrecy (PFS)
Index(es):
Date
Thread