[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SOI QUESTION: 4.1 Control channel vs. separate protocols
Notes from the chair:
This question basically introduces the various questions raised by
section 4 of the soi-features document, which goes to one of the biggest
differences to the JFK and IKEv2 approach.
4. One or two phases
4.1 Control channel vs. separate protocols
4.1.A) [Meta question, that will be answered by the other questions in
section 4.] Does SOI need a control channel for SA management? Or is
it acceptable to piggy back SA management as a part of other parts of
the SOI protocol?
Implications from the Scenarios:
VPN: <<<This calls out a need for either a two-phased approach for
SOI, or a single-phased approach that is sufficiently fast, where
"fast" represents an optimal combination of "number of messages" and
"computational expenditure".>>> [[[4.1]]]