Re: apology

[Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>]

At 8:02 PM -0700 6/27/02, Chinna N.R. Pellacuru wrote:
>I'll take your word for it, but none of "my colleagues" told me so. So,
>you will respond to only those who represent their employer's position?
>How do you determine that? Probably those who agree with you, represent
>their employers! everyone else don't!
>
>I really don't see why we should bring this discussion to a personal level
>or a corporate level. Anyway thanks a lot for letting me know what "my
>colleages" are thinking about me. Without you being honest, I would have
>never known what "my colleagues" are thinking about me and my discussions
>on this list. I hope you continue doing this in the future too, and to
>everyone on this list. It is really helpful to know the truth.
>
>     chinna

I was informed by your colleagues that they too don't want to waste 
time dealing with you, but some of them have no choice, by dint of 
sharing a common employer.

The discussion became personal because your style of argument stopped 
being rational some time ago.

The discussion had a corporate aspect when I mistakenly believed that 
you were communicating a corporate position.

I will spend time arguing with someone who was representing a large 
vendor's position, or with an intelligent person acting as an 
individual.

You qualify as neither, hence my decision to not waste more time on you.

Steve