[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: apology



On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Stephen Kent wrote:

> At 8:02 PM -0700 6/27/02, Chinna N.R. Pellacuru wrote:
> >I'll take your word for it, but none of "my colleagues" told me so. So,
> >you will respond to only those who represent their employer's position?
> >How do you determine that? Probably those who agree with you, represent
> >their employers! everyone else don't!
> >
> >I really don't see why we should bring this discussion to a personal level
> >or a corporate level. Anyway thanks a lot for letting me know what "my
> >colleages" are thinking about me. Without you being honest, I would have
> >never known what "my colleagues" are thinking about me and my discussions
> >on this list. I hope you continue doing this in the future too, and to
> >everyone on this list. It is really helpful to know the truth.
> >
> >     chinna
>
> I was informed by your colleagues that they too don't want to waste
> time dealing with you, but some of them have no choice, by dint of
> sharing a common employer.
>
> The discussion became personal because your style of argument stopped
> being rational some time ago.
>
> The discussion had a corporate aspect when I mistakenly believed that
> you were communicating a corporate position.
>
> I will spend time arguing with someone who was representing a large
> vendor's position, or with an intelligent person acting as an
> individual.
>
> You qualify as neither, hence my decision to not waste more time on you.
>
> Steve

Same with you. I will waste no more time too.

    chinna