Re: agenda?

[Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Scott" == Scott G Kelly <scott@bstormnetworks.com> writes:
    Scott> Hi Michael,

    Scott> I don't have IRC configured on my system, but wanted to check to
    Scott> see if 
    Scott> anyone had responded, and/or if you have any concerns/questions
    Scott> you'd 
    Scott> like to see addressed...

  Charlie's summary was very good.
  I'm happy about the schedule proposed.
  We call "preferred ID of responder" the "Me-Tarzan/You-Jane". This 
system is pretty important to us. There is a short writeup
       at: http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/design/2002-May/002514.html  
  
  I concur with William - the requirements need to be finished. We need to
write the Opportunistic Encryption scenario.

  A way to do versioning is CRITICAL.
  As are VENDOR extensions. Yes, a vendor extension may have the
"critical" bit set - that means that if you don't get it you refuse to
negotiate. I think that either I misunderstood Steve Bellovin, or he
misunderstood what was said....

  Oh, I concur with Eric Rescorla - the problem is the documents, and
      frankly, with the totally VAGUE PKI confusion, and certain PKI
      vendors who just don't get it.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPTUiioqHRg3pndX9AQFfIAQA1RzGvOi52o3NAkrAJD90srvHKPaW16sy
u8Mq+7Ajhux+CDatGIUXqGq2ehG6J1ITyJRdTf0m7xxgYleSI5tIrEhX86+5RysE
YNPX6dWTZqgGO17UikL4TkADk9zuPJtuS3jBji24L6VCbMFXqD77iqvwyhGwNitz
9QsrPX3bf8w=
=exYV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----