[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: One base SOI ID? Humm

To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:16:22 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20020718201652.012e3e70@mail>
References: <541402FFDC56DA499E7E13329ABFEA87060C06@SARATOGA><3.0.3.32.20020718201652.012e3e70@mail>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

At 8:16 PM -0700 7/18/02, Alex Alten wrote:
>It sounds like the requirements were never really spec'd out.
>Why not specify the top 10 requirements, and then run a test/
>runoff/review of the two proposals.  The one that meets the 10
>requirements the best should be the winner.

Errrr, that is what the past many weeks of questions from the WG 
chairs was doing. If you were following it, you would have seen that 
there was no unanimity among the WG about what are the requirements.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>
- Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>

References:
- One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
- Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
  - From: Alex Alten <Alten@attbi.com>

Prev by Date: RE: One base SOI ID? Humm
Next by Date: Re: new version of ESP ID
Prev by thread: RE: One base SOI ID? Humm
Next by thread: Re: One base SOI ID? Humm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread