RE: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003

["Andrew Krywaniuk" <andrew.krywaniuk@alcatel.com>]

Umm... surprised no one else has mentioned this, but it would be nice if
IKEv2 was stable enough by 2-3 months before the next bakeoff so that we
could all get some prototypes ready.

Andrew
-------------------------------------------
There are no rules, only regulations. Luckily,
history has shown that with time, hard work,
and lots of love, anyone can be a technocrat.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Scott Fanning
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: Philippe Cousin; Paul Hoffman / VPNC; Ghislaine Labouret;
> ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Re: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003
>
>
> So, I guess the question still stands to the wider audience.
> Is it time for
> a new round of baking? :-) In Finland there seemed to be an
> audience for it.
> Lets see what the consensus is.
>
> Scott
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philippe Cousin" <Philippe.Cousin@etsi.fr>
> To: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>; "Paul Hoffman / VPNC"
> <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>; "Ghislaine Labouret"
> <Ghislaine.Labouret@hsc.fr>;
> <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:34 AM
> Subject: RE: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003
>
>
> > As far as the organisation by the ETSI Interoperability Service is
> concerned, we are only providing the support (logistics, fund
> from EU if
> any, ..). We are at disposal of the community to define the
> interesting
> topics/sub-topics as long as enough participants/interests
> are foreseen.
> >
> > philippe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Fanning [mailto:sfanning@cisco.com]
> > Sent: 03 October 2002 00:02
> > To: Philippe Cousin; Paul Hoffman / VPNC; Ghislaine Labouret;
> > ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> > Subject: Re: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003
> >
> >
> > I would also like to know what would be the primary
> benefits of a bakeoff
> at
> > this time. I would think AES (in its various modes), NAT-T
> and maybe some
> > ipsra work as well. Are there specific issues that you see
> need to be
> > tested?
> >
> > Scott
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Philippe Cousin" <Philippe.Cousin@etsi.fr>
> > To: "Paul Hoffman / VPNC" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>;
> "Ghislaine Labouret"
> > <Ghislaine.Labouret@hsc.fr>; <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
> > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:13 AM
> > Subject: RE: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003
> >
> >
> > > It will be about 500 Euros per participant
> > > regards
> > > philippe
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org]
> > > Sent: Thu 26/09/2002 20:02
> > > To: Ghislaine Labouret; ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> > > Cc: Philippe Cousin
> > > Subject: Re: Potential bakeoff in France in 2003
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 9:10 AM +0200 9/26/02, Ghislaine Labouret wrote:
> > > >At the Yokohama IETF, people asked if there were plans
> for a new IPsec
> > > >bakeoff. The ETSI Interoperability Service, called
> Plugtests (currently
> > > >organizing an IPv6 interoperability event) is willing to
> organize one
> in
> > > >France in 2003, in particular as funding support from EU
> can be found.
> > > >See more info on the service at www.etsi.org/plugtests
> > >
> > > Could you give us a guess about how much participation
> might cost per
> > > person or per company?
> > >
> > > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > > --VPN Consortium
> > >
> > >
>