[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt

To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
From: "Housley, Russ" <rhousley@rsasecurity.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:54:07 -0500
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <p05200f1cb9f5d6b6e5bd@[165.227.249.18]>
References: < <5.1.0.14.2.20021110124741.020c4858@exna07.securitydynamics.com><5.1.0.14.2.20021110124741.020c4858@exna07.securitydynamics.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Paul:

>>Thanks for pushing this work forward.  I think that it is important if we 
>>are ever going to achieve interoperability with certificate-based key 
>>management.
>
>Russ, are you saying that you think this document is good for IKEv1, or 
>IKEv2, or both? Changing the ground rules for IKEv1 implementations at 
>this late date seems like a bad idea.

I think that the IPsec WG should be putting its energy into IKEv2.

Russ

References:
- draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
  - From: "Housley, Russ" <rhousley@rsasecurity.com>
- Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
Next by Date: RE: UDP-encapsulated IPsec Transport mode
Prev by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread