[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPD policy document/article

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: SPD policy document/article
From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:39:11 -0800
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <p05111a02ba032870e00d@[10.0.1.3]> (Stephen Kent's message of"Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:21:05 -0500")
Organization: Network Associates Laboratories
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021121190320.023dd090@172.16.1.10><sdvg2qk20i.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net><p05111a02ba032870e00d@[10.0.1.3]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.5 (brussels sprouts,i686-pc-linux)

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:21:05 -0500, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> said:

Stephen> RFC 2401 establishes the standard for the minimum required
Stephen> data elements for the SPD used in IPsec, and then defines how
Stephen> a conformant IPsec implementation uses this data. So, I
Stephen> assume your comments are referring to other protocols, right?

RFC2401 does talk about the SPD but in a very minimal context.  The
IPSP work is intended to define Ipsec Security Policy in greater detail.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Network Associates Laboratories

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPD policy document/article
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

References:
- SPD policy document/article
  - From: Lokesh <lokeshnb@intotoinc.com>
- Re: SPD policy document/article
  - From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
- Re: SPD policy document/article
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Counter Mode Security: Analysis and Recommendations
Next by Date: Re: Counter Mode Security: Attacks, Storage & a Proposal
Prev by thread: Re: SPD policy document/article
Next by thread: Re: SPD policy document/article
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread