[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward

To: Uri Blumenthal <uri@bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:51:14 -0500
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <3DEBBBAB.B320A10A@bell-labs.com>
References: <F504A8CEE925D411AF4A00508B8BE90A0162D056@exna07.securitydynamics.com><5.2.0.9.2.20021127191422.00b82a78@mail.binhost.com><5.2.0.9.2.20021202141513.02a32d10@mail.binhost.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Uri:

Normally, the IETF publishes algorithm specifications as Informational 
RFCs.  For example, MD5 is an Informational RFC.

The authors of CCM have also submitted it to NIST for consideration as a 
AES mode.

Russ

At 02:59 PM 12/2/2002 -0500, Uri Blumenthal wrote:
>Russ Housley wrote:
> > See draft-housley-ccm-mode-01.txt.
> >
> > It has been discussed on the CFRG mail list.  I hope it will be published
> > as in Informational RFC.
>
>You don't want to standardize it?

References:
- Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
  - From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
- Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
  - From: Uri Blumenthal <uri@bell-labs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
Next by Date: Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
Prev by thread: Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
Next by thread: Re: Counter Mode: Proposed Way Forward
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread