Re: How does IKEv2 provide solution to remote access?

["Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>]

There has been very little discussion on this topic. So little, in fact,
that I'm afraid we're going to wind up with ipsra-2 if we don't watch
out. Why aren't we addressing this?

I think a separate (MAY implement) exchange mode based on the proposal
by Harkins, Piper, and Korver (CRACK) would be the best way to go.

Scott

Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> 
> At 1:55 PM +0800 12/3/02, king wu wrote:
> >XAUTH was proposed, but it died.
> 
> It died for IKEv1. IKEv2 may have XAUTH or something like it in it.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium