Re: (fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2

[Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Avram" == Avram Shacham <shacham@shacham.net> writes:
    Avram> At 19:51 30.11.2002 -0500, Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com wrote:

    Avram> [snip]

    >> Rather, each node should announce what compression algorithms it is capable
    >> of decompressing and the two byte CPIs associated with each one. A sending
    >> node can optionally compress any outgoing packet with any of the algorithms
    >> supported by the other end. This has several advantages:
    >> 

    Avram> [snip]

    >> What do people think? Am I still confused?
    >> 
    >> --Charlie

    Avram> Brilliant.

  It is a slight change to how IPCOMP works.
  I think that it is worth it, in my opinion.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPe1WOoqHRg3pndX9AQEo/AQArTwQdevn7osYY5xtc98nVsqsIjVPYXmx
cJ3zF88T+wBDSyelQEY1MNyhnkynRtTE8MVROGjOoRZfS33uXgw+9T/QOlNWwnVz
tCGevjD5GMUabvywLoZuRaJ8g11pvbSvr0oU2mZz95Gg/jCiCf42bL9VFXTTFf7U
E0E7h2jJj3c=
=Lqu1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----